Abstract
Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing ‘boundaries’ between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to ‘boundary work’. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs’ perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 285-304 |
| Seitenumfang | 20 |
| Fachzeitschrift | AMBIO |
| Jahrgang | 54 |
| Ausgabenummer | 2 |
| Elektronisch veröffentlicht (E-Pub) | 19 Okt. 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - Feb. 2025 |
UN-Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung (SDGs)
2015 einigten sich die UN-Mitgliedstaaten auf 17 globale Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung (Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs) zur Beendigung von Armut, zum Schutz des Planeten und zur Förderung des allgemeinen Wohlstands. Hiermit leisten wir einen Beitrag zu folgendem/n Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung (SDGs):
-
SDG 15 Lebensraum Land
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Geografie, Planung und Entwicklung
- Umweltchemie
- Ökologie
Dieses zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver