Replies

Paul Hoyningen-Huene

doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1741-8

Replies

Paul Hoyningen-Huene^*

^*Korrespondierende*r Autor*in für diese Arbeit

Institut für Philosophie

Universität Zürich (UZH)

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

Abstract

In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad Wray, Sarah Green, Alexander Bird, and Timothy Lyons. These articles contain a number of objections and suggestions concerning systematicity theory, as developed in my book Systematicity: The Nature of Science (Oxford University Press 2013).

Originalsprache	Englisch
Seiten (von - bis)	907-928
Seitenumfang	22
Fachzeitschrift	Synthese
Jahrgang	196
Ausgabenummer	3
Elektronisch veröffentlicht (E-Pub)	1 März 2018
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1741-8
Publikationsstatus	Veröffentlicht - 15 März 2019

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Philosophie
Allgemeine Sozialwissenschaften

Zugriff auf Dokument

10.1007/s11229-018-1741-8

Andere Dateien und Links

Verknüpfung zur Publikation in Scopus

Dieses zitieren

@article{ff94da824b49415d9480a8256ccf8c94,

title = "Replies",

abstract = "In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad Wray, Sarah Green, Alexander Bird, and Timothy Lyons. These articles contain a number of objections and suggestions concerning systematicity theory, as developed in my book Systematicity: The Nature of Science (Oxford University Press 2013).",

keywords = "Clinical medicine, Continuity thesis, Demarcation criterion, Science education, Scientific rationality, Socratic scientific realism, Systematicity theory",

author = "Paul Hoyningen-Huene",

note = "Funding information: I wish to thank the three editors both for organizing this special issue of Synthese and for very fruitful comments on an earlier version of this paper, including linguistic improvements by Hasok Chang.",

year = "2019",

month = mar,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1007/s11229-018-1741-8",

language = "English",

volume = "196",

pages = "907--928",

journal = "Synthese",

issn = "0039-7857",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Replies

AU - Hoyningen-Huene, Paul

N1 - Funding information: I wish to thank the three editors both for organizing this special issue of Synthese and for very fruitful comments on an earlier version of this paper, including linguistic improvements by Hasok Chang.

PY - 2019/3/15

Y1 - 2019/3/15

N2 - In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad Wray, Sarah Green, Alexander Bird, and Timothy Lyons. These articles contain a number of objections and suggestions concerning systematicity theory, as developed in my book Systematicity: The Nature of Science (Oxford University Press 2013).

AB - In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad Wray, Sarah Green, Alexander Bird, and Timothy Lyons. These articles contain a number of objections and suggestions concerning systematicity theory, as developed in my book Systematicity: The Nature of Science (Oxford University Press 2013).

KW - Clinical medicine

KW - Continuity thesis

KW - Demarcation criterion

KW - Science education

KW - Scientific rationality

KW - Socratic scientific realism

KW - Systematicity theory

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85063059532

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-018-1741-8

DO - 10.1007/s11229-018-1741-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063059532

SN - 0039-7857

VL - 196

SP - 907

EP - 928

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

IS - 3

ER -