Abstract
The private provision of public goods generally suffers from two types of efficiency failures: sorting problems (the wrong individuals contribute) and quantity problems (an inefficient amount is provided). Embedding the provision game into a contest that rewards larger contributions with higher probabilities of winning a prize may remedy such failures. Applications include tenure decisions at universities, electoral competition among politicians, etc. We identify a tradeoff between the value of the prize and the decisiveness of the contest. High-powered incentives in contests may cause an overprovision of the public good or wasteful participation of unproductive individuals in the contest.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 161-179 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Southern economic journal |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2012 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver