Abstract
Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing ‘boundaries’ between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to ‘boundary work’. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs’ perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 285-304 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | AMBIO |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| E-pub ahead of print | 19 Oct 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2025 |
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- Boundary management
- Impact assessment
- Knowledge co-creation
- Land use change
- Scenario planning
- Suitability analysis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Environmental Chemistry
- Ecology
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver